Physician Burnout or EHR Burnout: A leadership role you aren’t trained for

Forty-two percent of physicians say they are burned out and they cite burdensome electronic health records (EHR) as one of the main reasons for it. It doesn’t matter if they are employed by a health system or self-employed, male or female, a primary care physician or specialist; onerous EHR systems are repeatedly reported as a root cause of burnout and dissatisfaction. It’s time to solve this seemingly intractable problem with powerful, intuitive technology that gives clinicians the formidable tools they need.

The most recent Medscape survey of more than 15,000 physicians from 29 specialties discovered that more than half (56 percent) of the physicians who reported being burned out cited an excess of bureaucratic tasks as the cause. One-quarter of them named EHR specifically.

A second study of nearly 4,200 practicing physicians in Rhode Island confirmed these findings. Published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), the study reported that 26 percent of respondents (1,792 physicians) reported burnout.

Ninety-one percent were EHR users and of them; seventy percent reported EHR as a cause of their stress.

The study took a deep dive into the EHR problems to determine the root cause of burnout. According to the study:

  • Those reporting poor or marginal time for documentation had 2.8 times the odds of burnout.
  • Those reporting moderately high or excessive time on EHRs at home had 1.9 times the odds of burnout.
  • Those who agreed that EHRs add to their daily frustration had 2.4 times the odds of burnout.

 

Burnout matters

 

 

Burnout isn’t just a problem for each individual physician; it’s a problem for the healthcare system at large. It impacts the delivery of care, physician error rates, and patient care. The AMIA study said physicians who report burnout symptoms have:

  • Higher rates of turnover
  • Higher prevalence of substance use disorders
  • More malpractice claims
  • More patient errors
  • Lower patient satisfaction rates with their care
  • Higher rates of unnecessary patient tests and consultations

Healthcare systems feel the impact of burnout as well.

  • Replacing a physician can cost between $250 000 to a million dollars
  • Physicians who are burned out may have more absences and lower productivity

There are those who say burnout is on the decline and that blaming it on the EHR is a matter of making the systems the scapegoat. However, it’s hard to ignore the fact that physicians continue to report EHR as a significant cause of their burnout. That is a reason enough to address the problem.

 

Avoiding “unintended consequences” of use  

 

 

The federal Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) oversees health information technology for the nation, and they have a list of suggestions to help users avoid what they call “unintended consequences” of EHR use. Their guide to EHR use states, “Unintended consequences result from complex interactions between technology and the surrounding work environment.”

Complex interactions should be removed regardless of where they are; external to the EHR function or within the system itself. That’s where the simplified clinical automation comes into play. The best EHR systems are built specifically with usability, performance, and reliability in mind. The developers understand the dynamic nature of medical practice and create software that makes it easy and intuitive for physicians to fulfill substantial documentation requirements. Great EHR systems are a solution rather than an obstacle between the physician and successful quality metrics – and revenue.

Streamlined EHR platforms provide bundled functionality in an intuitive system that makes a clinician’s work easier. It should provide complete access to:

  • Appointments
  • Clinical reviews
  • Patient notes
  • Medical histories
  • Document manager

The best EHR systems allow physicians to connect instantly with:

  • Patients
  • Payers
  • Labs
  • Hospitals
  • Other stakeholders

A simplified, automated EHR system integrates with regulatory and quality metric functions to improve revenue. An EHR system should be:

  • ONC 2015 Edition certified
  • MIPS compliant
  • Ready for Meaningful Use Stage 2 and Meaningful Use Stage 3
  • Delivered with an ICD-10 guarantee

When these features and functionalities are available, an EHR system becomes truly useful rather than burdensome to the user.

 

Making EHR a powerful tool

 

Given the fact that EHR is here to stay, it must meet physician needs. Despite its many problems, EHR has the potential to fulfill its initial promise and become a powerful, comprehensive solution. Developed with physician needs in mind, EHR can deliver built-in specialty content, customizable workflows, patient portal, intelligent billing, clearinghouse functionality with SMART dashboards and business intelligence reporting. EHR should transform practice operations, and with it, the bottom line.

In fact, the only acceptable EHR is one that streamlines clinical, administrative, and financial operations of care delivery organizations, enabling collaboration, productivity, and service quality.

 

Moving to mobile

 

EHR moving on Mobile

 

One of the most frequent criticisms of Meaningful Use (MU) requirements is that it has become the driving force behind EHR design, leaving physician and patient needs behind. The ONC says that EHR should “actively involve clinicians and staff in the reassessment and ongoing quality improvement of technology solutions”. That is true, and mobile technology is making that a reality.

The problem with complicated EHR systems is that they hide physician/patient interaction behind a complicated web of keystrokes. On the other hand, mobile EHR systems provide physicians with instantaneous visibility into the many layers of patient care and documentation. In the palm of a hand, it provides the opportunity to review patient clinical details, create new patient records, electronically prescribe, and use Siri to dictate notes. It moves EHR from the dusty confines of the original system design and into the 21st century where it meets the fast-paced needs of today’s clinicians.

 

Conclusion

There is a powerful need to transform EHR to reduce physician burnout. Burdensome keystrokes and antiquated systems are interfering with physician performance and adversely impacting patient care. It’s an untenable situation that needs immediate resolution.

Streamlined, performance-based EHRs do exist. They can transform physician practices. They deliver an EHR experience where keystrokes reveal powerful knowledge bases instead of layers of opaque windows and onerous tasks.

It’s time to deliver EHR systems that meet the rigorous demands of everyday practice. The delivery of systems that give physicians the tools they need to optimize quality, performance, and patient care is long overdue.